Health Care Fraud lawyer Arlington County, VA

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

Admitted in Virginia, Maryland, District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York

Practicing since 1997

Last reviewed: July 2026

Federal health care fraud charges in Arlington County, Virginia, are prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 1347
in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia
works closely with federal agencies such as the FBI, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General,
and the IRS Criminal Investigation division to investigate and charge providers, practice managers, and others accused of
defrauding Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, or private health insurance programs. A conviction under § 1347 carries a
statutory maximum of ten years’ imprisonment, and the possibility of life imprisonment if the fraud results in death.
Because the federal system has no parole, a defendant who receives a custodial sentence will serve the vast majority of
that sentence in a federal Bureau of Prisons facility. Arlington County residents, medical professionals practicing
in the Rosslyn‑Ballston corridor, and businesses with federal contracts in Crystal City and Pentagon City face the
full weight of federal prosecution when health care fraud allegations arise. Early engagement of counsel is critical;
Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys are available to discuss your matter. Reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437-7747 to request a consultation.

On this page

What Health Care Fraud Means in Arlington County

Health care fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1347 involves knowingly executing a scheme to defraud any health care benefit
program. The Eastern District of Virginia encompasses Arlington County, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Alexandria
handles the prosecution of these cases. Investigations often begin with data analytics that identify anomalous billing
patterns, and they quickly escalate to federal grand jury subpoenas, search warrants, and interviews with former
employees or patients. Because Arlington County is part of the dense government‑contractor ecosystem surrounding
Washington, D.C., health care fraud charges frequently intersect with federal contract fraud statutes and the False
Claims Act. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines significantly influence the actual sentence a defendant faces; the
Guidelines calculation accounts for the amount of the intended loss, the number of victims, the defendant’s role in
the offense, and any abuse of a position of trust.

Procedurally, a federal health care fraud case in Arlington County moves through the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, a court widely recognized for its efficient “rocket docket.” After an initial appearance
before a magistrate judge, a detention hearing determines whether the defendant will be released pending trial.
Federal grand jury indictment is required for felony charges. Pre‑trial discovery in health care fraud cases is
document‑intensive, often involving millions of pages of medical records, billing data, and electronic communications.
The Speedy Trial Act governs the timeline, though complex cases frequently involve excludable delays for motion
practice and evidentiary review. Sentencing, if the matter proceeds to a conviction, is conducted by a U.S. District
Judge under the advisory Sentencing Guidelines, which continue to exert substantial influence on the final sentence.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Health Care Fraud Cases

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys focus on early intervention—often before an indictment is returned—to
engage with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the investigating agencies. In health care fraud matters, the pre‑indictment
phase can provide the most consequential opportunities: challenging the sufficiency of the government’s evidence,
presenting alternative loss‑amount calculations, and demonstrating compliance programs that may mitigate the
appearance of criminal intent. Mr. Sris draws on his experience as a former prosecutor to anticipate the
government’s charging strategy and to identify weaknesses in billing‑pattern analyses, patient‑recruiter testimony,
and medical‑necessity determinations. The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys, who bring extensive combined legal experience
to federal criminal defense, assist with the review of voluminous discovery and the coordination of forensic
accountants and medical experts when needed. Results may vary.

When a case cannot be resolved through negotiation—whether via a deferred prosecution agreement, a plea to a lesser
offense, or a dismissal of some counts—the firm prepares rigorously for trial. That preparation includes motions to
suppress evidence obtained through allegedly overbroad search warrants, challenges to the admissibility of summary
witness testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 1006, and the development of a factual narrative that places the
billing practices in their proper regulatory context. Throughout the process, Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel colleagues
maintain open communication with the client, explaining each procedural step and the strategic considerations that
inform their recommendations.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., has been practicing since 1997. He is a former
prosecutor and is admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York.
Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron
Del. David Bulova). His prosecutorial background gives him a practiced understanding of how federal investigations
are constructed, from the initial qui tam complaint through the execution of search warrants.

The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys support federal criminal defense matters with substantial collective experience.
Together with Mr. Sris, they have documented case results across multiple practice areas. The firm maintains a
presence in Arlington County and represents clients before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring extensive combined legal experience. Results may vary.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does a Virginia lawyer defend against health care fraud charges?

Defense strategies for health care fraud in Virginia may include challenging the government’s evidence,
examining whether the billing practices complied with applicable regulations, and negotiating with prosecutors to
resolve the case on terms that minimize the impact on the defendant. An experienced defense attorney will
scrutinize the loss‑amount calculation, because that figure drives the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range.
Challenges may also be raised to the reliability of data analytics, the credibility of cooperating witnesses, and
the admissibility of summary charts. Each case is fact‑specific, and the appropriate strategy depends on the
evidence the government has assembled.

What should I do if I am facing health care fraud charges in Virginia?

If you are facing health care fraud charges in Virginia, contact a federal criminal defense attorney
immediately and do not discuss the case with anyone except your lawyer. Preserve all relevant business
records, correspondence, and electronic data, but do not alter or destroy any documents. The prosecution’s case
often begins to take shape well before an indictment is filed, so early legal guidance can help you avoid
statements or actions that could later be used against you. The statute of limitations and court deadlines under
federal law make prompt action essential.

What are the penalties for health care fraud in Virginia?

Penalties for health care fraud in Virginia depend on the specific charges, the amount of the intended
loss, and the defendant’s prior record, but 18 U.S.C. § 1347 authorizes a maximum of ten years’ imprisonment
for each count—extending to life if the fraud results in death. There is no parole in the federal system,
so a defendant serves at least 85 percent of any imposed sentence. Fines, restitution orders, and forfeiture of
assets are common. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines often produce a recommended range that heavily influences
the actual punishment. An attorney can help you understand the potential exposure in your particular
circumstances.

Do I need a lawyer if I am being investigated for health care fraud in Arlington County?

Yes—obtaining counsel at the investigation stage, before an indictment is returned, is one of the most
important steps you can take to protect your rights. Federal investigations involving health care fraud
in Arlington County are conducted by experienced agents who have already reviewed billing data and interviewed
witnesses. An attorney can communicate with investigators on your behalf, advise you on document preservation,
and work to narrow the scope of the inquiry. Early intervention often creates opportunities to resolve the matter
without criminal charges.

How do federal sentencing guidelines apply to health care fraud cases?

Federal sentencing for health care fraud in the Eastern District of Virginia is guided by the U.S.
Sentencing Guidelines, which calculate an offense level based largely on the intended loss amount, the number
of victims, and whether the defendant occupied a position of trust. The Guidelines also account for
acceptance of responsibility, which can reduce the offense level. While the Guidelines are advisory, judges in
the Eastern District give them substantial weight. Mandatory restitution to the affected health care benefit
programs is almost always ordered. A lawyer familiar with the Guidelines can present arguments that may affect
the loss‑amount determination or support a variance below the recommended range.

What is the difference between state and federal health care fraud charges?

Federal health care fraud is prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office under 18 U.S.C. § 1347, carries
steeper penalties, and eliminates the possibility of parole, while state‑level fraud charges in Virginia are
handled by local Commonwealth’s Attorneys under state criminal statutes with generally lower sentencing
exposure. Federal cases also involve different procedural rules, including grand jury indictment
requirements, broader discovery obligations, and sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Many
health care fraud investigations engage both federal and state authorities, so understanding the distinction
is critical when choosing counsel.

Authoritative Resources
18 U.S.C. § 1347 ·
Federal Sentencing Guidelines ·
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results may vary.

Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.