Theft of Government Property lawyer Fairfax County, VA

Federal theft of government property charges in Fairfax County, Virginia, are prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, often following investigations by agencies such as the FBI, the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, or the Internal Revenue Service. These cases can stem from a wide range of conduct—allegations that a government contractor misused federal funds, that a federal employee took property belonging to a government agency, or that someone used fraudulent means to obtain government benefits or equipment. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, with its Alexandria Division serving Fairfax County, handles these matters under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. A conviction can carry significant, long-term consequences, including incarceration in a federal facility without the possibility of parole. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys focus their practice on federal criminal defense and work with clients to address every stage of the federal criminal process. To discuss your situation with an experienced multi-state defense team, reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437-7747. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

On this page

What Theft of Government Property Means in Fairfax County, VA

Under 18 U.S.C. § 641, it is a federal crime to embezzle, steal, purloin, or knowingly convert to one’s own use any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency. The law also covers anyone who receives, conceals, or retains such property knowing it to have been stolen. Charges can be brought for a broad spectrum of actions: from taking computer equipment from a federal facility to filing false invoices with a government program. Federal jurisdiction attaches because the property or funds at issue belong to the United States government.

Fairfax County is home to numerous federal installations—Fort Belvoir, the U.S. Geological Survey headquarters, and a dense network of government contractors and agencies that interact with federal funds daily. When a theft offense touches those entities or federal money, the case is typically investigated by a federal agency and presented to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, which has a strong record of pursuing these prosecutions. Cases handled in the Alexandria Division require defense counsel who are familiar with the federal court’s local rules, the U.S. Attorney’s practices, and the Sentencing Guidelines that drive outcomes.

The federal criminal process begins with an investigation—sometimes lasting months—before a grand jury indictment. An initial appearance and detention hearing before a federal magistrate judge in Alexandria can determine whether the accused remains in custody while the case proceeds. From that point, the timeline depends on the complexity of the evidence, pretrial motions, and plea negotiations. Because of the procedural and substantive differences from Virginia state court, anyone facing a federal theft charge in Fairfax County should seek guidance from an attorney experienced in federal defense. Reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437-7747 for a consultation.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Theft of Government Property Cases

When Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys undertake a federal theft defense, the approach begins with a careful review of the government’s evidence—search warrant applications, financial records, electronic data, and witness statements. The goal is to identify the factual foundation of each allegation and assess whether the government can meet its burden. Because many federal theft of government property cases depend on documentary evidence and financial trails, the defense often examines whether the records support an intent to steal or whether the conduct reflects an administrative or contractual dispute rather than a crime.

Mr. Sris, a former prosecutor, and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys evaluate potential defenses early: Was the property actually owned by the United States? Did the accused act with the specific intent required under the statute? Is the charged value of the loss accurate? These and other questions can affect charging decisions and the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. The firm’s attorneys also concentrate on pretrial motions—suppressing evidence obtained through questionable searches, challenging the sufficiency of the indictment, or seeking release from custody—and on negotiating with the U.S. Attorney’s Office when resolution short of trial serves the client’s interests. When trial is the trusted course, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring extensive trial experience to the federal courtroom.

In every case, the defense team works to communicate clearly with the client about the realistic range of potential outcomes, the risks of proceeding to trial, and the steps that may influence the court at a sentencing hearing. Because the federal system has no parole, every month of a potential sentence matters, and the firm’s attorneys focus on presenting the strongest mitigation possible. Reach the firm at (888) 437-7747 to discuss your situation.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., founded the firm in 1997 and has built a practice that concentrates on criminal defense in both state and federal courts. Admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, Mr. Sris brings insight from his background as a former prosecutor to each federal theft defense he handles. He testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova), a measure that addressed certain evidentiary issues in family law—demonstrating a commitment to legal process that extends beyond any one courtroom.

The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys contribute litigation experience across multiple practice areas, including federal criminal matters. Together, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys provide the depth of attention and courtroom focus that clients need when facing serious federal charges. The legal team has served clients in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and understands the expectations of the federal bench and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Alexandria. To discuss defense options or to schedule a consultation, reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437-7747.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does a Virginia lawyer defend against theft of government property charges?

Defense strategies in federal theft of government property cases include challenging the government’s evidence, examining the accused’s intent, disputing the value of the loss, and advancing constitutional objections. A Virginia federal criminal defense attorney may also challenge whether the property in question truly belonged to the United States or whether the conduct was made with the requisite knowing intent. In some cases, demonstrating that the client lacked intent—for example, that a billing irregularity was a civil contract dispute rather than a crime—can lead to a dismissal or reduction. Experienced federal counsel will thoroughly review discovery, file appropriate motions, and advise on the viability of a plea or trial. For a consultation, reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437-7747.

What should I do if I am facing theft of government property charges in Fairfax County, Virginia?

Contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately, preserve all relevant documents, and refrain from discussing the case with anyone except your lawyer. Federal investigations can be lengthy, and what an accused says during an interview can be used against them. If you have received a target letter or have been indicted, an attorney can begin reviewing the evidence right away and advise you on the trusted steps—including whether to engage a forensic accountant or other experienced attorney. Because of the tight procedural deadlines in the Eastern District of Virginia, obtaining representation early can protect your rights. Reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437-7747 for a consultation.

What are the penalties for theft of government property in Virginia?

Penalties for federal theft of government property depend on the value of the loss, the defendant’s criminal history, and specific offense characteristics under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. A conviction can result in a federal prison sentence without parole, substantial fines, and orders of restitution to the government agency involved. In cases involving a loss of more than $1,000, the potential sentence is generally greater, but the court has discretion under advisory Guidelines. Because the federal system has no parole, every component of the sentence directly affects how long the person remains incarcerated. An attorney experienced in federal sentencing can help present the strongest mitigation case.

If the theft amount is small, will the case still go to federal court?

Yes, if the property involved is United States government property, even a small-dollar theft can be prosecuted in federal court under 18 U.S.C. § 641. The statute applies regardless of the monetary value, though the value does affect the sentencing range. Federal prosecutors often have discretion to decline or charge, but once filed, the case proceeds in U.S. District Court—not Virginia state court—and is subject to federal procedure and sentencing. An attorney can evaluate whether the government’s evidence supports all the elements of the offense and whether any grounds exist for a pretrial resolution. Contact the firm for case-specific guidance.

Internal pages:

Federal primary sources:

18 U.S.C. § 641 – Theft of Government Money or Property
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
United States Sentencing Commission – Guidelines Manual

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder. Admitted in Virginia, Maryland, District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. Practicing since 1997. Last reviewed: July 2026.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.